Central American vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,926,566 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 38.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 15.2% |
| Range | 6.2% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.3% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are German Russian (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scottish (2.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Marshallese (2.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Congo (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Germany | 3.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Hawaiians | 2.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Hmong | 2.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Welsh | 2.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.3% |
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Central Americans | 1.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Scottish | 1.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.3% |
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |