Brazilian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Malaysia
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.74% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 49.6% |
Range | 29.9% | 46.2% |
Mean | 12.5% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |