Brazilian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Malaysia
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.81% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 26.4% |
Range | 19.8% | 25.3% |
Mean | 8.3% | 8.3% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |