Brazilian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Guamanians/Chamorros
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.9% | 98.8% |
Mean | 12.5% | 17.2% |
Median | 11.9% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Guamanians/Chamorros by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |