Brazilian vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Argentineans
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Argentinean |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 23.9% |
Range | 29.9% | 22.4% |
Mean | 12.5% | 10.5% |
Median | 11.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |