Brazilian vs Chilean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chilean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Chileans
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Chilean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.74%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 25.4% |
Range | 29.9% | 22.9% |
Mean | 12.5% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Chileans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |