Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chilean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chilean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chileans
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
68.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chilean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,053,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chilean |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 25.4% |
Range | 52.9% | 22.9% |
Mean | 16.3% | 11.0% |
Median | 13.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chileans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |