Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,927,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.92%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 38.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.6% | 60.0% |
Mean | 66.2% | 67.1% |
Median | 64.4% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |