European vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
European
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Europeans
Chickasaw
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,245,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.98%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 26.5% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.5% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 70.5% | 67.1% |
| Median | 70.4% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.0% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.5% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |