Immigrants from Honduras vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Honduras
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Honduras
Chickasaw
64.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
35.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Honduras vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,466,893 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 64.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.37%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Honduras | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 32.4% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.7% | 60.0% |
Mean | 64.5% | 67.1% |
Median | 65.3% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.2% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.4% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Honduras and Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Honduras are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (64.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (64.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Jamaican (64.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Micronesia (64.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Vietnamese (64.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 52.5 /100 | #173 | Average 64.3% |
Immigrants | Germany | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 64.3% |
Bangladeshis | 44.3 /100 | #175 | Average 64.3% |
Vietnamese | 43.6 /100 | #176 | Average 64.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 42.3 /100 | #177 | Average 64.2% |
Jamaicans | 40.6 /100 | #178 | Average 64.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 38.2 /100 | #179 | Fair 64.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 35.0 /100 | #180 | Fair 64.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 34.9 /100 | #181 | Fair 64.2% |