Immigrants from Thailand vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Alaskan Athabascans
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,927,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 38.4% | 17.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.6% | 82.2% |
Mean | 66.2% | 59.5% |
Median | 64.4% | 59.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 67.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |