Pakistani vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pakistanis
Chickasaw
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
11.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,217,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 42.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 21.2% |
| Range | 13.2% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |