Dominican vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Dominican
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Dominicans
Chickasaw
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,884,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 75.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.73% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 21.2% |
| Range | 6.1% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Thai (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |