Pakistani vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Chickasaw
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,136,890 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 25.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 32.7% | 33.0% |
| Range | 32.0% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 10.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |