Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,823,945 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 73.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.44% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 21.2% |
Range | 5.9% | 18.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.91% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.91% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Senegal (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Bolivian (2.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Ghana (2.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 99.7 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |