Immigrants from China vs Luxembourger Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Luxembourger
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Luxembourgers
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Luxembourger Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,538,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 5.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.84% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 5.3% |
Range | 12.1% | 4.8% |
Mean | 1.9% | 1.7% |
Median | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.90% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.89% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Luxembourgers by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), Burmese (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |