Ute vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Ute
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Ute
Pima
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%, a difference of 0.13%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Pima |
Minimum | 23.7% | 46.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 76.3% | 53.6% |
Mean | 73.4% | 79.8% |
Median | 75.4% | 81.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 71.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 95.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.3% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |