Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sudanese
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sudanese
Zimbabweans
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Sudanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,518,758 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 27.9 Zimbabweans.
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $98,586, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($78,529 compared to $90,618, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $106,849, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.8%), median earnings ($44,419 compared to $48,229, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $51,259, a difference of 9.1%).
Income Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,695 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,783 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,529 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,419 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,216 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,215 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,982 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,401 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,718 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,281 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.0% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Unemployment Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.0% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.8% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.9% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (60.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 60.0% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.4% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.6% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Good 6.4% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.8%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.2% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sudanese vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Sudanese | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |