Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Exceptional
Exceptional
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,505,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $97,880, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $57,352, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $63,643, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.62%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.4%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%