Creek vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,483,398 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.619% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 619.1 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $98,091, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $91,668, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $82,029, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,336, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $37,531, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 33.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.9%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.87%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 7th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.91%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.7%).