Creek vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,804,792 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 10.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,584, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $87,553, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $106,188, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,374, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,976, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.2%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.4%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.7%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%).