Creek vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,015,363 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $34,584, a difference of 31.2%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $40,550, a difference of 28.1%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $32,500, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $36,876, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $41,715, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 70.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 65.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 17.9%), single female poverty (27.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 54.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.47%), female disability (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and male disability (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.0%).