Chinese vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,420,912 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.973. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 230.2 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $50,475, a difference of 53.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $79,171, a difference of 46.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $68,412, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $34,106, a difference of 21.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,107, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 84.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 80.1%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.6%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 46.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 71.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.1%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 69.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.8%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.7%).