Chinese vs Cypriot Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,844,862 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Cypriots.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $54,899, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,549, a difference of 15.3%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,589, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($98,496 compared to $102,843, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $123,396, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.42%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 90.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 55.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 49.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.1%).