Chinese vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,749,915 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 86.1 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,620, a difference of 16.3%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,638, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,771, a difference of 0.75%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $105,089, a difference of 0.79%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,392, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 56.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.12, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.31%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.8%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.2%).