Chinese vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,058,847 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,087, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,361, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $63,346, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,336, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,053, a difference of 1.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,836, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.93%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 56.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.8%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.6%).