Immigrants from Uruguay vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,856,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 100.0 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $35,922, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $79,171, a difference of 21.4%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $68,412, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $50,475, a difference of 12.9%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $46,656, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%).