Ute vs Spaniard Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Spaniard
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Spaniards
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Spaniard Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,393,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 28.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Spaniard |
Minimum | 9.6% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.4% | 94.7% |
Mean | 33.1% | 34.1% |
Median | 25.0% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 44.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 26.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 27.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spaniards by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |