Ute vs Immigrants Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Immigrants
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 23.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants |
Minimum | 9.6% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.2% |
Range | 90.4% | 31.6% |
Mean | 33.1% | 17.8% |
Median | 25.0% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Panamanian (17.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |