Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Chile
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Chile
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
76.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,642,193 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 37.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 9.6% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
Range | 90.4% | 43.0% |
Mean | 33.1% | 16.2% |
Median | 25.0% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |