Ute vs Immigrants from Mexico Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Mexico
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Mexico
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Mexico Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,744,550 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 0.80%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 9.6% | 10.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.4% | 89.4% |
Mean | 33.1% | 33.4% |
Median | 25.0% | 25.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 21.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 34.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Immigrants from Mexico by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |