Turkish vs Czech Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Czech
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Czechs
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Czech Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Czech |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 18.7% | 25.0% |
| Range | 16.3% | 23.4% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 7.4% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Czechs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |