Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Czech Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Czech
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Czechs
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Czech Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Czech |
Minimum | 0.35% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 25.0% |
Range | 13.5% | 23.4% |
Mean | 6.2% | 7.4% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Czechs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |