Turkish vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Czech
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Czechs
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,652,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Czech |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 38.7% |
Range | 15.5% | 38.3% |
Mean | 7.6% | 8.3% |
Median | 7.1% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Czechs by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |