Turkish vs Burmese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Burmese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Burmese
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Burmese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 18.7% | 29.5% |
Range | 16.3% | 28.8% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Burmese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |