Samoan vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Jordan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Jordan
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,249,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.76%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.57% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 37.9% | 30.3% |
Range | 37.3% | 28.5% |
Mean | 11.5% | 11.0% |
Median | 10.0% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Jordan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |