Samoan vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Yugoslavian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Yugoslavians
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Yugoslavian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.88%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 26.2% |
| Range | 37.3% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 9.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |