Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Immigrants from Jordan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Immigrants from Jordan
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,310,825 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,249,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 53.4% | 30.3% |
| Range | 53.2% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 11.0% |
| Median | 12.3% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |