Samoan vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Jordan
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,052,897 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 38.0% | 64.9% |
| Range | 35.7% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 13.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |