Mexican vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexicans
Chickasaw
13.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 563,818,602 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.806 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.9% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 34.1% | 33.0% |
Range | 25.2% | 30.8% |
Mean | 15.3% | 15.0% |
Median | 13.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Yaqui (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (13.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.8% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.8% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.8% |