Bermudan vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Chickasaw
12.2%
MALE POVERTY
2.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,715,607 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 10.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.81% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 33.0% |
Range | 24.8% | 30.8% |
Mean | 10.5% | 15.0% |
Median | 10.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cambodia (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bermudans | 2.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.2% |
Ugandans | 2.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.1 /100 | #222 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.3% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |