Osage vs Nepalese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Nepalese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Nepalese
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Nepalese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Nepalese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 31.6% |
| Range | 29.7% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 16.0% |
| Median | 14.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Nepalese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |