Mexican vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mexicans
Chickasaw
25.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,731,472 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798 and weighted average of 25.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 4.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.9% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 27.4% | 35.8% |
| Median | 25.5% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.6% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%), Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 2.0%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |