Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,225,965 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,347,863 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.45%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 24.7% | 73.1% |
| Range | 18.0% | 66.5% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 15.6% |
| Median | 14.4% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Immigrants by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |