Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Icelander Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Icelander
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Icelanders
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
68.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Icelander Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,053,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,608,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Icelander |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 33.3% |
Range | 52.9% | 32.9% |
Mean | 16.3% | 11.8% |
Median | 13.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Icelanders by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |