Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chilean Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chilean
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chileans
12.1%
POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chilean Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,083,252 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,580,078 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chilean |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 29.7% |
Range | 39.7% | 27.8% |
Mean | 14.8% | 10.3% |
Median | 12.2% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chileans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Yugoslavian (11.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |