Eastern European vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Chinese
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,080,941 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 11.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.82% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 19.1% |
Range | 59.5% | 17.8% |
Mean | 10.1% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |