Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Chinese
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,808,313 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 16.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 19.1% |
Range | 28.6% | 17.8% |
Mean | 8.9% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Scandinavian (7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |