Eastern European vs Luxembourger Family Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Luxembourger
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Luxembourgers
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Luxembourger Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,080,941 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 0.31%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.82% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 60.3% | 13.1% |
Range | 59.5% | 12.7% |
Mean | 10.1% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.3% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Luxembourgers by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |