Danish vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Danes
Chinese
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,902,124 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 12.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 19.1% |
Range | 33.8% | 17.8% |
Mean | 8.5% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |